Ah, have to disagree. Life has no rules at all. :)

Have to say I don´t really like Bethesda games in a vanilla/ unmodded state, except for Fallout New Vegas, the others I had to mod to a certain degree to enjoy them. I think that´s what makes their (Bethesda) games so great, not the story or the gameplay, but how you can change certain aspects of the games through mods, only my oppinion of course.

I´d give the Empire Earth series 7 points, but I agree on you with Pillars of Eternity, the story may be good, but i couldn´t get into the games.

What I don´t get is, all we do is talk about our own oppinions, not facts, they differ from person to person and we won´t change them just because you tell me how amazing "!XYZ" is, so why are some people trying to shove their oppinion down others throats ? Oh yeah, having an oppinion is considered trolling ? ...Well, okay...

Only by people who don't like opinions. :D

If that´s how they want to participate in a "discussion", their loss. :D

I like this there. Might be more useful than some of the so called reviews on the gamecards :D. As long as its reviews on games on GOG (bought here) ;)

That's an Obsidian game, so that might be why. ; )

On what scale?
7 out of 10? Pretty good.
7 out of 5? ( =P ) Phenomenal!
7 out of 100? [shudder]

That may be correct. :)

On a scale to 10. :)

Wot?
Unless you're using some strange ratings, usually:
4 = very insufficient
5 = insufficient
6 = sufficient

On a non-shitty 1-10 rating scale, 5 (not 7!) should mean "average". All the "professional" review sites that are afraid to give games lower than a 7, lest some publishers blacklist them, have skewed people's perceptions. Nobody should need six separate ratings reserved for different flavors of "below average".

Morrowind is a game of layers that you have to peel back carefully. What you see at the sprawling surface is not what you will find at its dense core. But I can understand if someone does not want to put endless hours into a game to finally discover what it actually is about. I feel the same about some other obviously great games.

Since a lot of rating systems use the numbers 1-5 (like Amazon), I usually apply them in this way:

5 - Excellent
4 - Good
3 - Ok
2 - Bad
1 - Crap

Therefore you will probably see less 5s from me than from most people.

You have a weird definition of "precision". :P

Did I screw up the translation? I meant more "accurate".
Otherwise, I know that none of those terms are exact, but "average" seems really generic to me.

No, you're right, "precise" basically means "accurate". :)
What I meant was that "sufficient" and "insufficient" are no less subjective than "good" and "bad" -- these are all equally imprecise terms which rely heavily on understanding what the particular player or reviewer's personal tastes are.