It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Get ready, because Lust Academy Final is here!

Lust Academy Final offers a thrilling mix of magic and adult fantasies. Strengthen the academy, build alliances, and explore steamy relationships while battling dark forces. Face intense challenges and make crucial choices in this captivating adventure.

You can also get:
Lust Academy Final - Shadows Unleashed
Lust Academy Final - Beyond the Veil
Lust Academy Final: Complete Edition

Now on GOG!
I'm too old for this stuff as opposed to being too young ( I really cannot be bothered with it).
It clutters up my views with Games (?) I have no interest in.
A simple filter would be handy for me, make my life easier.
Thank you GOG :o)
avatar
ERISS: @ marcob: This end game is suspected being a cash-grab made by AI,
as they removed the gameplay and the story seems being irrelevant.
avatar
marcob: It does not make sense: a program A for a computer created by a computer program B? Then it's just created by the programmers of program B, with extra steps, or rather created using B as a middleman. "videogame created by AI" sounds to me like someone saying "created by Unreal Engine". I don't think you can have a full game just by installing a "maker" and pressing a button. The "maker" program must be instructed. But then it's not AI, it's programming on top of a tool

Are you speaking of the 3d models alone? Are they the product of a third-party generic tool, like a random combination of basic body types with limited human intervention? Is it what you're saying (I imagine something like the "random character model" function in Elder Scrolls type games, for example, since, AI or not, its base is classic part combination)

I dn't know. It could be. The end result is what I'm mostly about at this point, and I find it not natural-looking, forced and a bit uninspired, bland. You don't need AI to end up with that, though.
Okay, so all of this is made by DAZ3D, a program created in Utah. DAZ3D like Unreal or Unity has it's own asset store. Some of these games are also made with Blender or Octane. Treasure Of Nadia though, for example is made in RPG Maker. If it's not to your style, that is fine. But it is the style we've grown accustomed to. Once again, we're supporting these games on Patreon with our money. So if you don't like it, it really won't stop it from coming as others do. We're here for the story. Chasing Sunsets is beloved because of its story. The "I don't like thing" posts make no sense. I can't stand strategy games, but you don't see me complaining on the game posted today because it is a strategy game. Nope, I keep my opinions to myself and let those who enjoy it, enjoy it. Hope you can understand that.

If you don't like it, just ignore it. You aren't the audience for it, quite simply.
avatar
ERISS: You're right, I say it may be made using an AI as a tool, for sure. AIs are not yet sentient... lol
If they did give it completely to AI then I regret my purchase. Hence, I'm still doing Season 2 for the channel so it could be months before I get to Season 4 to verify. I don't mind AI created games like Strong Girls, which has a human writer. But if AI wrote the story too then what's the point? It won't even make sense from a plot standpoint. I really hope Bear In The Night didn't do that.
Post edited July 09, 2025 by TheGrimLord

avatar
marcob: Of course all hand-drawn or 3d picture characters can't and ought not to be like real people photos (they're fictional characters in a stylised audio-video, not special fx characters meant to be in a live action like, for example, in replacement scenes with deceased actors). Still, this is just too cartoony to be photorealistic and too photorealistic to be cartoony.
So, you have some of the girls and a boy or two, especially when expressions chosen are rather woody, that fall in between. The result is they seem off not just in real life (like an anime character, perfectly fit for its world, would be absurd in our world due to strange proportions of its parts) but even in-universe. These characters seem depiction of statues or artificial beings (a bit like Evangelion's Rei, or sci-fi androids, or that famous guy on social media who stood nearly expressionless, pale-white with a bowl cut: they got him a slight tan, a bit of curls and a wardrobe change recently).
Yet in-universe they're not depictions or recreations, they're meant to be real girls. It's creepy, especially when you're supposed to bed them, I think. To the point the girl from Nier Automata, DBZ cyborgs or even Alita or Motoko are instinctively percieved as far more attractive and girl-like (and they're almost robots, according to their respective stories!)
Mate, you don't get to decide the industry. People who like this style give it money. Lots and lots of money. If you don't like it, don't play it. Check out Steam, it'll have a far bigger selection of adult games. That's where I buy most of mine now since 99% of the adult gaming industry is DRM-Free.
Not saying they should be forced not to do their game! On the other hand, "the world, the money and their moms do this and you can't do nothing about it" is not a reply, it's irrelevant to the criticism, at least most of the time: I'm not about to get a law to pass or to get voted. What I say is these elements do not blend and their effect has consequences on the viewer. It's not a "like/don't like"stance as in " it's my taste or yours", more of "one should have measure using certain kind of art direction or there are intrinsic risks" that detract from the reception.
I frankly don't know where you found any censorship intention in what I said. What worries me is that a trend gets bigger yet already shows flaws that are difficult to mitigate.
Post edited July 09, 2025 by marcob
avatar
marcob: It does not make sense: a program A for a computer created by a computer program B? Then it's just created by the programmers of program B, with extra steps, or rather created using B as a middleman. "videogame created by AI" sounds to me like someone saying "created by Unreal Engine". I don't think you can have a full game just by installing a "maker" and pressing a button. The "maker" program must be instructed. But then it's not AI, it's programming on top of a tool

Are you speaking of the 3d models alone? Are they the product of a third-party generic tool, like a random combination of basic body types with limited human intervention? Is it what you're saying (I imagine something like the "random character model" function in Elder Scrolls type games, for example, since, AI or not, its base is classic part combination)

I dn't know. It could be. The end result is what I'm mostly about at this point, and I find it not natural-looking, forced and a bit uninspired, bland. You don't need AI to end up with that, though.
avatar
TheGrimLord: Okay, so all of this is made by DAZ3D, a program created in Utah. DAZ3D like Unreal or Unity has it's own asset store. Some of these games are also made with Blender or Octane. Treasure Of Nadia though, for example is made in RPG Maker. If it's not to your style, that is fine. But it is the style we've grown accustomed to. Once again, we're supporting these games on Patreon with our money. So if you don't like it, it really won't stop it from coming as others do. We're here for the story. Chasing Sunsets is beloved because of its story. The "I don't like thing" posts make no sense. I can't stand strategy games, but you don't see me complaining on the game posted today because it is a strategy game. Nope, I keep my opinions to myself and let those who enjoy it, enjoy it. Hope you can understand that.

If you don't like it, just ignore it. You aren't the audience for it, quite simply.
avatar
ERISS: You're right, I say it may be made using an AI as a tool, for sure. AIs are not yet sentient... lol
avatar
TheGrimLord: If they did give it completely to AI then I regret my purchase. Hence, I'm still doing Season 2 for the channel so it could be months before I get to Season 4 to verify. I don't mind AI created games like Strong Girls, which has a human writer. But if AI wrote the story too then what's the point? It won't even make sense from a plot standpoint. I really hope Bear In The Night didn't do that.
That other store doesn't mention any AI, and they still require disclosure I believe.
DAZ does have some AI functions in their Studio now though afaik..

Mate, you don't get to decide the industry. People who like this style give it money. Lots and lots of money. If you don't like it, don't play it. Check out Steam, it'll have a far bigger selection of adult games. That's where I buy most of mine now since 99% of the adult gaming industry is DRM-Free.
avatar
marcob: Not saying they should be forced not to do their game! On the other hand, "the world, the money and their moms do this and you can't do nothing about it" is not a reply, it's irrelevant to the criticism, at least most of the time: I'm not about to get a law to pass or to get voted. What I say is these elements do not blend and their effect has consequences on the viewer. It's not a "like/don't like"stance as in " it's my taste or yours", more of "one should have measure using certain kind of art direction or there are intrinsic risks" that detract from the reception.
I frankly don't know where you found any censorship intention in what I said. What worries me is that a trend gets bigger yet already shows flaws that are difficult to mitigate.
Again, this is the style and we like it. We do not want these to go mainstream. Especially after what happened with No Mercy. If it turns people off, that's good. We're a niche community that supports each other. As long as we have money, this scene will continue.
avatar
noshisenpai: Can you guys not implement a setting to block this degenerate crap from the homepage?

GOG used to be about DRM-free classics and games with substance not softcore porn being blasted across the front page. Even Steam gives users the ability to filter this stuff. Why don’t we have the same option here?
avatar
TheGrimLord: ^
Bait. Ignore this person, they are just trying to bait people to argue with them. Probably not even a GOG user. My guess is there was a reddit post that drew attention. Again, ignore. Block if necessary.
I literally own 330+ games on GOG and have been a member since 2020. I just don’t live on the forums like some of you.

Sorry not everyone thinks the same way you do. Wanting the option to filter out softcore porn from the homepage isn’t bait it’s a reasonable request that’s been brought up for years by actual paying users.

You don’t have to agree with me, but pretending I’m not a real user or dismissing anyone who speaks up as “bait” is just lazy forum talk. GOG used to be about better curation and respecting its user base. I want to help keep it that way.
avatar
noshisenpai: GOG used to be about DRM-free classics and games with substance not softcore porn being blasted across the front page. Even Steam gives users the ability to filter this stuff. Why don’t we have the same option here?
avatar
SargonAelther: Steam has a filter, because Steam shows explicit videos and screenshots. GOG forbids explicit content in videos and screenshots, so whatever you see "blasted across the front page" is no different to what you see in your local mall.
Mall? Who even hangs out at malls anymore? And back when they mattered, I could just not walk into the Victoria’s Secret store.

GOG doesn’t give me that choice... they’re pushing this stuff front and center on the homepage and emailing it out like it’s some big release. That’s not passive promotion, that’s forced visibility.

And let’s be real: these aren’t subtle games. “Lust Academy” isn’t exactly a deep character-driven RPG.

Also Steam lets you filter out way more than just NSFW content. You can filter tags, entire genres, hide games from your library, make purchases private, and completely tailor your storefront experience. GOG doesn’t offer any of that.

Asking for a simple toggle isn’t censorship, it’s just common sense.
Post edited July 10, 2025 by noshisenpai
avatar
noshisenpai: Sorry not everyone thinks the same way you do. Wanting the option to filter out softcore porn from the homepage isn’t bait it’s a reasonable request that’s been brought up for years by actual paying users.
It's one thing to request a filter to blend out certain genres - it's another to call it degenerate therefore making those who buy it degenerates as well. There's no need for insults and it definitely is not deserved just because you dislike a certain genre.

avatar
noshisenpai: GOG used to be about better curation and respecting its user base. I want to help keep it that way.
You want to help GOG with the curation by demanding a filter? Or do you mean that you want to help GOG keeping only the genres you like by complaining about those you dislike?

avatar
noshisenpai: GOG doesn’t give me that choice... they’re pushing this stuff front and center on the homepage and emailing it out like it’s some big release. That’s not passive promotion, that’s forced visibility.
Guess what, they are doing the same with strategy games which I really, really dislike.

avatar
noshisenpai: And let’s be real: these aren’t subtle games. “Lust Academy” isn’t exactly a deep character-driven RPG.
Yeah, let's be real. You have never played a single one of those games - have you? If you had you would have known that Lust Academy is very story oriented with hours of actual story and only a few minutes of sexual content in them. If you had you would have known that Lust Academy actually offers some minigames inside and quite a few choices. Yes, it is no RPG but why should it? It is a visual novel which is a different genre. It's fine not to like something but before you judge something it might be better to inform yourself what exactly you are trying to judge.

avatar
noshisenpai: Also Steam lets you filter out way more than just NSFW content. You can filter tags, entire genres, hide games from your library, make purchases private, and completely tailor your storefront experience. GOG doesn’t offer any of that.
Not exactly correct. Even GOG let's you hide games from your library and you can filter tags ect. at least if you are using the search function of the store ... you cannot hide them in the actual catalogue though.

avatar
noshisenpai: Asking for a simple toggle isn’t censorship, it’s just common sense.
Common sense? Common sense would be to ignore what you don't like ... but I am aware that this is too much to ask from some people ... but yes, it is practical and can make browsing the catalogue easier.
Post edited July 10, 2025 by MarkoH01
Alright, so let me make this clear and simple. Please GOG, can we get this damn filter so that people will stop complaining? I think it would be the best for everyone. That way people who want to see these games would see them and people who don't won't see them. Makes it easy for everyone.

But I swear, if after the filter is added there are still these kind of complaints, I'm going right to reports. I know there are some jokes cracked every now and again. That's fine. But after that filter is finally up, I don't want to see people complaining about this content anymore. You are right that GOG should add simple filter options. Everyone here is 100% right about that. But what you aren't right about is what games shouldn't be here because of content. That isn't what GOG are about.
My site GameSieve.com might function as an alternative front-end for gog's catalogue/homepage - I exclude all games with the NSFW-tag by default, but you can set your own defaults (e.g. allowing NSFW, excluding strategy).

You do this by changing the selection and pressing the "remember" button underneath the applied filters (for changes other than the NSFW-exclusion, which is remembered automatically and so doesn't show the button on its own), which stores the country/currency/sorting/filters selection in a cookie and automatically applies them on subsequent visits.
Post edited July 10, 2025 by gogtrial34987
avatar
TheGrimLord: I know there are some jokes cracked every now and again. That's fine.
Listen, everyone! The long night is over! We have TheGrimLord's permission to joke (sometimes)! Truly, this day shall long be remembered as The Day of Begrudgingly Allowed Occasional Jests! Go now, People of the Forum, and be moderately merry!
avatar
TheGrimLord: I know there are some jokes cracked every now and again. That's fine.
avatar
Breja: Listen, everyone! The long night is over! We have TheGrimLord's permission to joke (sometimes)! Truly, this day shall long be remembered as The Day of Begrudgingly Allowed Occasional Jests! Go now, People of the Forum, and be moderately merry!
On a more serious note, I just don't want the battles that we had over these kinds of games. We all know what it was like many years ago and there's no need for that.
avatar
TheGrimLord: ^
Bait. Ignore this person, they are just trying to bait people to argue with them. Probably not even a GOG user. My guess is there was a reddit post that drew attention. Again, ignore. Block if necessary.
avatar
noshisenpai: I literally own 330+ games on GOG and have been a member since 2020. I just don’t live on the forums like some of you.

Sorry not everyone thinks the same way you do. Wanting the option to filter out softcore porn from the homepage isn’t bait it’s a reasonable request that’s been brought up for years by actual paying users.

You don’t have to agree with me, but pretending I’m not a real user or dismissing anyone who speaks up as “bait” is just lazy forum talk. GOG used to be about better curation and respecting its user base. I want to help keep it that way.
avatar
SargonAelther: Steam has a filter, because Steam shows explicit videos and screenshots. GOG forbids explicit content in videos and screenshots, so whatever you see "blasted across the front page" is no different to what you see in your local mall.
avatar
noshisenpai: Mall? Who even hangs out at malls anymore? And back when they mattered, I could just not walk into the Victoria’s Secret store.

GOG doesn’t give me that choice... they’re pushing this stuff front and center on the homepage and emailing it out like it’s some big release. That’s not passive promotion, that’s forced visibility.

And let’s be real: these aren’t subtle games. “Lust Academy” isn’t exactly a deep character-driven RPG.

Also Steam lets you filter out way more than just NSFW content. You can filter tags, entire genres, hide games from your library, make purchases private, and completely tailor your storefront experience. GOG doesn’t offer any of that.

Asking for a simple toggle isn’t censorship, it’s just common sense.
Oi I own about 845. And I'm still having that Neverwinter Demeaning Edition shoved in my face.
Don't get me wrong, I'm tottaly fine with filters, in fact I really want them, I use augmented Steam for a reason.
That the Topic only ever arises with games that show skin is hilarious though.
avatar
Breja: Listen, everyone! The long night is over! We have TheGrimLord's permission to joke (sometimes)! Truly, this day shall long be remembered as The Day of Begrudgingly Allowed Occasional Jests! Go now, People of the Forum, and be moderately merry!
avatar
TheGrimLord: On a more serious note, I just don't want the battles that we had over these kinds of games. We all know what it was like many years ago and there's no need for that.
Years ? Has it really been so long ?
Post edited July 10, 2025 by Reaper9988
avatar
DHatch: I heard the main plotline of the story doesn't get resolved and instead it just kinda sets up a final resolution but then just... ends without finishing things.
A porn without climax? Now, that's a new one...
Actually 844 well fuck.
avatar
Reaper9988: Oi I own about 845. And I'm still having that Neverwinter Demeaning Edition shoved in my face.
Don't get me wrong, I'm tottaly fine with filters, in fact I really want them, I use augmented Steam for a reason.
That the Topic only ever arises with games that show skin is hilarious though.
Well, one thing with porn games is they are not easily filtered out using tags without "collateral losses" so to speak. If you filter out "NSFW" or "sexual content" you'll also hide stuff like Postal, or Witcher or Larry. If we get an option to hide games of our choice (a sort of anti-wishlist is what I want) I'll hide all the roguelikes which I hate just as surely as I'll hide the porn. But filtering out games tagged "roguelike" using the currently available way is more predictable and narrow, so they're less of a problem browsing the store. (of course, using the tags for anything is iffy around here, as has been discussed many times)

Also, the porn games tend to have... let's say particular aesthetics, mostly either these creepy uncanny sex dolls or anime, stuff that you don't have to be in any way morally outraged by the sexual nature of the games to want to hide for a more pleasant experience with the store.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying there's no "moral panic" with some users, I'm just saying there are other reasons the porn games prompt most of these requests.